Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden.

نویسندگان

  • Georgios Sianos
  • Michail I Papafaklis
  • Joost Daemen
  • Sofia Vaina
  • Carlos A van Mieghem
  • Ron T van Domburg
  • Lampros K Michalis
  • Patrick W Serruys
چکیده

OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the impact of thrombus burden on the clinical outcome and angiographic infarct-related artery stent thrombosis (IRA-ST) in patients routinely treated with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND There are limited data for the safety and effectiveness of DES in STEMI. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 812 consecutive patients treated with DES implantation for STEMI. Intracoronary thrombus burden was angiographically estimated and categorized as large thrombus burden (LTB), defined as thrombus burden > or =2 vessel diameters, and small thrombus burden (STB) to predict clinical outcomes. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as death, repeat myocardial infarction, and IRA reintervention. RESULTS Mean duration of follow-up was 18.2 +/- 7.8 months. Large thrombus burden was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.76, p = 0.023) and MACE (HR 1.88, p = 0.001). The cumulative angiographic IRA-ST was 1.1% at 30 days and 3.2% at 2 years, and continued to augment beyond 2 years. It was significantly higher in the LTB compared with the STB group (8.2% vs. 1.3% at 2 years, respectively, p < 0.001). Significant independent predictors for IRA-ST were LTB (HR 8.73, p < 0.001), stent thrombosis at presentation (HR 6.24, p = 0.001), bifurcation stenting (HR 4.06, p = 0.002), age (HR 0.55, p = 0.003), and rheolytic thrombectomy (HR 0.11, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Large thrombus burden is an independent predictor of MACE and IRA-ST in patients treated with DES for STEMI.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Use of drug eluting stents in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Methods We retrospectively analyzed 812 consecutive patients treated with DES implantation for STEMI. Intracoronary thrombus burden was angiographically estimated and categorized as large thrombus burden (LTB), defined as thrombus burden 2 vessel diameters, and small thrombus burden (STB) to predict clinical outcomes. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as death, repeat myocardial ...

متن کامل

Long-term Outcomes of Drug-eluting versus Bare-metal stent for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE To investigate long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS We performed search of MEDLINE, EMBA...

متن کامل

Paclitaxel-eluting versus uncoated stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND Drug-eluting coronary-artery stents have been shown to decrease restenosis and therefore the likelihood that additional procedures will be required after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the use of a drug-eluting stent in patients undergoing PCI for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. METHODS We randomly assigned 619 patients presenting with...

متن کامل

-Year Follow-Up After Primary Percutaneous oronary Intervention With a Paclitaxel-Eluting tent Versus a Bare-Metal Stent in Acute T-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Follow-Up Study of the PASSION (Paclitaxel-Eluting Versus onventional Stent in Myocardial Infarction With ST-Segment Elevation) Trial

ackground In primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocarial infarction (STEMI), the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) is still controversial. Several randomized ontrolled trials of DES, compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), with short-term follow-up showed a eduction in target lesion revascularization (TLR), but no differences in rates of cardiac death or re...

متن کامل

Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS We randomly assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, 3006 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to receive paclitaxe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

دوره 50 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007